When it comes to movies, for every original movie idea
there’s always a remake that comes around. For today’s sake there’s kind of a
thin line between both original and remake which is known as a reboot. These
days the way people have labeled certain movies have confused the two to the
point where upcoming re-creations of movies have been labeled as a reboot as opposed to a
remake. Or vice versa to some extent.
It’s
gotten to a point where some people don’t know the difference anymore. In the last
few years there have been on and off talks about Columbia doing a “Ghostbusters
3”. Although a few months ago the studio decided to go through with it;
although they’re using a new cast. A female cast no less. Which is why it would be
considered a remake since the original cast from the two original movies are
not returning especially Bill Murray. A lot of movie news sites, fans and the Internet
community on the other hand are considering it a reboot.
Now for those who don’t know what the difference is between a remake and a reboot, let me break down the difference between the two. A remake is a movie that is an updated creation of the original with some minor differences in the plot. Examples of movie remakes would like “Total Recall”, “True Grit”, “Clash of the Titans”, “Godzilla” and “The Italian Job” just to name a few. Remakes basically use the original movie as the main source of material but have an allusion of some changes within whether it’s the plot, dialogue, characters or whatever.
Reboots
on the other hand seem to be more of a revamp rather than a remake. These
movies have more affect on an established character or franchise that have so
much room story wise to where they can disregard the last movie or franchise
but occasionally make a nod or reference to the previous franchise without it
being too obvious. Reboots tend to touch more on movies that were a franchise
or a trilogy.
Reboots also tend to be a big deal on comic book
movies. Take the Batman movies for example. They made a franchise of
movies in the 90’s that took some of the material from the comics but Hollywood
changed many aspects of it to where it doesn't closely resemble the comic.
After the critically panned “Batman & Robin” was released in 1997, it ended
the Batman franchise. Warner Bros had another Batman movie ready to go but
canceled it after the negative reception “Batman & Robin” got from fans and
critics alike. It wasn’t until 2005 when Warner Bros released “Batman Begins”
to restart the Batman franchise and bring it back to the big screen with a new
actor and a darker plot that closely represented the material from the comic
book. The same goes for the Spider-Man movies. The Sam Ramini movies had some
ties from the comic books but were mostly Hollywood’s interpretation of the
comic books. The recent Spider-Man reboot franchise on the other hand more
direct to the comics even though there are some factors where Hollywood will
have some plot holes different from the comic.
One would think with remakes and reboots these days Hollywood would at
least do something to establish the difference between the two for the
audience’s sake. Then again, the majority of the movie audiences probably don’t
care because they’ve seen it all before and they just want to see something
original for a change. Both remakes and reboots maybe similar but in the end
people are kind of comparing apples and oranges.